Covid data seems not to justify anything we have done about it: Links 2, November 27, 2020

1. Johns Hopkins censors its own data and research on Covid deaths

2. Amazon warning: Retail giant allowing Chinese firms to pretend they are in BRITAIN

(AAaaaand now we can see why they get special rights and riches)

EXCLUSIVE: Amazon is allowing foreign firms to fool internet shoppers by posing as British-based businesses, a Daily Express investigation reveals today.

The web giant admitted its rules do not prevent sellers from countries like China suggesting they operate from the UK. Many customers who thought they were buying British have reported receiving poor quality goods or very late deliveries. Consumer experts believe in some cases the practice is a con to take money from buyers who put more trust in UK firms.

3. Here are interesting numbers

4. Go Fund me info for Toronto BBQ owner

5. Marseille France business owners marching for the most basic of freedoms.

Thank you Sassy, Wrath of Khan, EB., ET., Johnny U., and Many more. Please keep it coming. When things get hard is when we are the most needed.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

2 Replies to “Covid data seems not to justify anything we have done about it: Links 2, November 27, 2020”

  1. Any and all lazy terrified little morons who are using Amazon
    Deserve to get a dose of Covid and die
    Besos is close to being the first Trillionaire

    Get off your fucking asses and go out shopping
    To all the small stores still open
    Pay 2 bucks extra and do your shopping OFF line

    Go to all stores open

  2. #1 Here is an article explaining the data and the censorship:

    Johns Hopkins Study Saying COVID-19 Has ‘Relatively No Effect on Deaths’ in U.S. Deleted After Publication
    BY MATT MARGOLIS NOV 27, 2020 11:24 AM ET

    Conventional wisdom is that COVID-19 has caused thousands of deaths in the United States and nearly 1.5 million worldwide. This perception has been directly challenged by a study published by Johns Hopkins University on Sunday, November 22.

    Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Johns Hopkins University, critically analyzed the impact that COVID-19 had on U.S. deaths. According to her, the impact of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States can be fully understood by comparing it to the number of total deaths in the country.

    According to study, “in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”

    Wait, what? Really?

    That’s what it says. And, it should come as no surprise that not long after the study was published it was deleted within days.

    Luckily, a back-up copy remains on The Wayback Machine, and we can still read the study.

    So, how exactly did the study conclude that COVID-19 has had “relatively no effect on deaths”? Here’s how the study made this determination:

    After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.

    Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.

    According to Briand, “The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals.”

    Briand’s analysis found that the range of deaths amongst the older population has remained within the range of past years.

    So, if COVID-19 has actually had no significant impact on U.S. deaths, why does it not appear that way?

    To answer that question, Briand shifted her focus to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020. There is a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19. This is no surprise because COVID-19 emerged in the U.S. in early 2020, and thus COVID-19-related deaths increased drastically afterward.

    Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes, with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia.

    “This is true every year,” explained Briand. “Every year in the U.S. when we observe the seasonal ups and downs, we have an increase of deaths due to all causes.”

    Here’s where things get interesting.

    When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.

    The study found that “This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years.” In fact, “the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19.”

    Briand concludes that the COVID-19 death toll in the United States is misleading and that deaths from other diseases are being categorized as COVID-19 deaths.

    There have reports of inflated COVID-19 deaths numbers for months. Patients who never tested positive for the disease had COVID-19 as their cause of death on their death certificates. In May, Jared Polis, the Democrat governor of Colorado, disputed official coronavirus death counts, saying even those of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were inflated from including people who tested positive for the coronavirus but died of other causes. In July, a fatal motorcycle accident victim was listed as a COVID-19 death.

    On Thursday, Johns Hopkins University explained that they deleted the article on the study because it “was being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies about the impact of the pandemic.”

    They did not, however, challenge the accuracy of the data or its conclusions. In other words, the article was deleted because it didn’t fit the proper narrative.

Leave a Reply to Morticiaa Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*