Part III of explaining Habermas Marxism: Stigmatizing the whole culture

This is part III of the series being translated by Ava Lon, of the Polish academic and artist, who has retooled his life to expose to the public what communism really is. In this segment, he shows the tactic of how communists stigmatize all normality within a culture.

Direct link:

https://d.tube/v/vladtepesblog/QmXq24i6EsR9QxoCJUCef2D5Msqzg3fDFxBxsrqGVx5tED

The first two parts can be seen at these links:

How a minority can dominate a majority

How truth becomes Hate Speech 

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

9 Replies to “Part III of explaining Habermas Marxism: Stigmatizing the whole culture”

  1. Habermas is indeed a cancer. Whether the “thoughts”, which he still (celebrated) spread, actually originate from him, is something professionals should argue about. (There are probably other some wrongdoers like Marcuse or Adorno who proberly indoctrinated him.) But this cancerous ulcer a la déformation professionnelle made definetively the biggest personal profit out of it through his youth.

    • “Cultural relativism” means in the end “everything is the same”. Whether a mangy dog shits in a corner – or a brilliant painter does a great job in years of effort. Their destructive nihilism is ultimately an adoration of the dead.

      • “adoration of the dead” = death cult/self-destruction

        We are dealing here with self-eating cancer & AIDS,
        the strategic discouragement of all immune forces.

        • Interesting the word form or shape. In German also “Gestalt”. Shapeshifter. De-Form, In-Form. But also words who contain “gen”: general, generous, genial, generation, de-generate and so on.