About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

12 Replies to “How long till Google takes this down?”

  1. They all are absolutely corrupt in the Democratic Socialist Party and the Media. Its total coup against America, don’t let them fool you. It all about overtaking America for Socialists. Boycott every last one of them and their sponsors.

  2. Blind leftist arrogance and absolute power will not stop at shutting down conservative voices. This is just the start. If they have their way they will hack 2020, then will install a defacto dictatorship resolved to prevent all future Trumpian aberrations. They’ve now telegraphed this. This denial of democracy will be premised on all of the tired, false narratives we are force-fed today. Hate speech (what hate?), the rise of white supremecists (where, exactly?), squelching opposition to anthropogenic climate change because the science is closed, the gender fluidity con–all the usual empty vessels. Don’t underestimate them. They’re smart and they know what they want. Wealth and power. These are real fascists. The means of production and business ownership will be retained by cronies like Google, Facebook and Youtube who are willing to play ball. Obama was just a stepping stone, it seems. Hillary was going to close the deal. She was meaner than O and as corrupt as hell with nary a scruple. They’ll find another like her.

    If 2016 was important, wait until 2020. Google sure is. Their ideal model seems to be more the Chi-coms construct, or even Putin’s more transparent mafia set-up. When the MSM and social media fix is in, social credit will dictate terms and conditions.

    • They are making one real big mistake, they live in liberal bubbles on the coasts and are ignoring fly over country. The majority of the military comes from this area and retire to this area, the majority of them don’t want to be disarmed. They have fought in wars where you don’t know who among your “allies” you can trust and thus they are well armed. The vets and the preppers have their own lines of communications, the coastal self proclaimed elite have made fun of these groups for years, now they are moving and are going to discover that they have made a real big mistake. They have some vets among their groups but those tend to be the rear echelon types, they are ready for what is coming.

    • She was meaner than O and as corrupt as hell with nary a scruple.

      If only the explanation of this piece of work were that neat and tidy. Unqualified in clinical head-shrinking though I may be, taken in combination: The near-Tourettes profanity, her congenital prevarication, and the obvious Clintonian custom of serial contract murder all point towards a full-blown and sometimes flamboyant psychotic persona. 0’Hillary’s monomaniacal obsession with sprouting herself a penis political power is the shortcut of choice to a permanently demagnetized moral compass. After so much traffic, her ethical bypass probably is a rutted track by now. Or is rutting Bill’s job description?

      • I’ve never heard of a female Tourettes, except for my cussin’ wife when I don’t straighten the doilies.

  3. Related: “Amusing Ourselves to Death” by Neil Postman

    “The John Moore Radio Show: Wednesday, 26 June, 2019”
    John Moore – Published on June 26, 2019
    Second HR – Jeff Nyquist beginning @ 47:50.

    **@1:16:34 – Jeff Nyquist – “Amusing Ourselves to Death” Neil Postman
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSjDfIzlCaQ

    “Neil Postman Are We Amusing Ourselves to Death Part I, Dec. 1985”
    ashikmakonja – Published on December 18, 2011

    • Part II can be found here: Neil Postman Playlist
      https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDxCoLvUKNQGuHgaxbZD31Ln5GTEt85Mn

      “College Lecture Series – Neil Postman – ‘The Surrender of Culture to Technology'”
      College of DuPage – Published on June 3, 2013

      @ 00:50:40 – The Seven Questions.

      1. What is the problem to which a technology claims to be the solution?
      2. Whose problem is it?
      3. What new problems will be created because of solving an old one?
      4. Which people and institutions will be most harmed?
      5. What changes in language are being promoted?
      6. What shifts in economic and political power are likely to result?
      7. What alternative media might be made from a technology?

      ….But it is not about the media but it is about ourselves….

      • The Seven Questions

        1. What is the problem to which a technology claims to be the solution?
        2. Whose problem is it?
        3. What new problems will be created because of solving an old one?
        4. Which people and institutions will be most harmed?
        5. What changes in language are being promoted?
        6. What shifts in economic and political power are likely to result?
        7. What alternative media might be made from a technology?

        “Why LED Street Lighting and 5G in Ireland must be stopped, with weapons expert Mark Steele”
        Gemma O’Doherty – June 26, 2019

        • This is really dangerous ground on so many different levels that it makes 3-D chess look like gomoku. Waaay too many conspiracy pitfalls for my taste. Be that as it may, just as with the Great Warmening™ there’s an astonishing degree of fertility to the dirt being dished up.

          For every last right reason, I’ve already spilled enough electrons here about the potentially increased disposition of organisms towards mutagenicity imparted by living in an environment increasingly saturated by RF (especially, but including the entire EMF range, too) spectral energy.

          In all seriousness, it only stands to reason.

          After all, how much mold do you see growing inside microwave ovens (barring those in dorms and frats, that is)? Birds don’t nest much atop those radio station broadcast antennae either.

          NOTE: — It’s how microwave ovens were discovered. At Raytheon, resident genius, Percy Spencer (an orphan who never finished grammar school), had tested a high power magnetron and was intrigued to find a peanut-roll candy bar in his pocket had melted.

          For fun, here’s an exquisite vintage Westinghouse spectrum chart (of which I have framed and unframed copies of in the original OEM color scheme): http://www.scantech7.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Electromagnetic-Spectrum-Chart-Old.jpg

          In high resolution, it shows all the satellite and ground-based communication bands of that time including weird crap like scrapyard electromagnet fields and boost phase telemetry channels used at launching pads.

          Where there once were ginormous spacings (i.e., far in excess of the safety margins or “band gaps” needed) to separate individual carrier waves and isolate larger shelves in the overall signal transmission inventory things are getting more crowded than an open bar at a double wedding.

          Speaking of bars, much like Spencer’s candy snack—definitely caramel-based, like a Payday, and not chocolaty because cacao butter has a much lower melt point—the only question remaining is: What sort of energy density (i.e., Watts RF at frequency X or bandwidth Y per cubic CC^3) will humans tolerate before our brains start cooking off like stray rounds of munitions from a burning dump?

          This is the “slow kill” issue and it, nonetheless, is overshadowed by (what I consider to be) the injudicious over-prescription of powerful neurochemical modifiers like anti-depressants, Ritilan, anti-psychotics, and a pharmacopeia of too often physically addictive drugs. The huge numbers of people given these with only with “lick-and-a-promise” mammal and large primate testing prior to widespread distribution. is tantamount to criminal.

          More about LED illumination later, but suffice to say how that Scottish chap provides an admirably clear description of the ingenious way a UV LED’s output cone is directed towards an upper lens (much like with a glowing CRT screen) whose interior side is a phosphor-coated surface which then undergoes secondary emission in the form of seemingly acceptable white light. The jury’s still out on that “acceptable” part.

  4. That should be Susan Wojcicki sitting in that chair answering those pointed questions, not the Wojcicki clone they’ve got sitting there now. Susan Wojcicki is an angry Marxist feminist bitch who hates men almost as much as she hates democracy and freedom of speech and it is she who is the CEO of YouTube and it is she who would remove your rights if she had her way. Know the enemy and it is Susan Wojcicki…