Fascinating history of muslim rule in India, and the fight back

Posted on by

Thank you PC.

I think the guest is wrong about one thing though. At this stage, if muslims offered to partition England and took over one area say, in the North, I think the British would be relieved. It would buy them another 50 or 100 years before the muslims took over the rest.

From January 2018:

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

3 Replies to “Fascinating history of muslim rule in India, and the fight back”

  1. The Narrative:
    “This summer heralds a major exhibition telling the story of the last great native kingdom which challenged the British for supremacy of the Indian subcontinent. ‘Empire of the Sikhs’ will be on view at the Brunei Gallery, SOAS from 12 July to 23 September 2018.

    The Sikh Empire (1799–1849), which spanned much of modern day Pakistan and northwest India, was forged by the ‘Napoleon of the East’ Maharaja Ranjit Singh (1780–1839)who became known as Sher-e-Punjab, the Lion of Punjab, over his forty-year reign.

    Maharaja Ranjit Singh established a powerful military meritocracy that included many European officers.”
    https://www.soas.ac.uk/gallery/empire-of-the-sikhs/

    https://www.empireofthesikhs.com/exhibition/

    These marxists/cowards do not say why the Sikhs had to develop a warrior code of chivalry and meritocracy so despised by The West. The real defence against muslims, and not the British.

    Muslim conquest of the Indian subcontinent began during the early 8th century AD. According to a 1900 translation of Persian text Chachnamah by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg.

    History repeats itself, and another Son of Man, Guru Nanak, who was born in 1469 A.D, founded Sikhism.

    Buddha, Jesus and Nanak. Authentic people to deal with the warlords and rapists of their time by taking away their power of terror. The masses no longer capitulated when one of their citizens was abused by the State.

    Protect our present ones, our Tommy Robinsons, who are refined by the fires of hell.

  3. You are probably right about the Brits being willing to give up part of the British Isle in exchange for a few years of peace from the terrorists. The Upper classes anyway, the lower classes seem to be more patriotic and more willing to fight for their nation. The partition of India was done as the Brits pulled out not during the Islamic Conquest, I don’t see the Invaders being willing to take part when fighting on they could get all. If the Brits can find their rallying point and their war leader they can retake their nation and help save Europe from the Islamic Conquest.

    I know this seems far fetched but things can turn around overnight if the right person starts calling for resistance to the Islamic Conquest. All it would take is for the grooming gangs to start on the upper middle class girls instead of concentrating on the lower class girls. That or somethi9ng else to cause the Brits to rise up and say enough.