Comey lied under oath

H/T Perfect Child

Lets not forget Obama:

Thank you MissPiggy

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

20 Replies to “Comey lied under oath”

    • A cabal of liars.
      RICO the lot of them. Assuming you can find competent feebies with enough guts and authority to charge and prosecute.
      If not, chop the FBI into little pieces. Sub-departmental working groups.
      Top-tier => Gitmo.

      • I am not sure you can RICO them, to do that you would have to prove that they made money from their corruption, so far only one person could (possibly be charged) with taking a bribe and he is McCabe. Which is another reason for him to disappear until after he is officially retired.

        • …you would have to prove that they made money from their corruption…

          I seem to vaguely recall how every last one of these treacherous bastids drew something akin to a federal paycheck. Doesn’t that prove these traitors, “made money from their corruption”?!?

          Equally vague is my fuzzy recollection of them taking something called an, “oath of office”.

  1. Here’s another liar.

    OBAMA: I GUARANTEE THERE IS NO POLITICAL INFLUENCE IN ANY INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OR FBI

    • OBAMA: I GUARANTEE THERE IS NO POLITICAL INFLUENCE IN ANY INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OR FBI

      With such an ironclad assertion of legal rectitude by 0bama, how could their be even the slightest lingering doubt regarding whatever best intentions expressed by this posterior-osculating, Islamophillic, TRAITOR?!?

      When this treasonous, fetid, turd is given a protracted stay at the gray-bar hotel, maybe then will I have some hope for this nation’s continued survival.

    • Big Media, Big Government and DNC are all basically one entity now.

      While I cannot claim to be a most erudite student of history, the foregoing statement frankly embodies so many glaring truths about modern-day America that I live in fear for this country’s ultimate survival.

      It is light-years beyond appalling that the Constitutional brilliance of this nation’s Founding Fathers has been being placed at such extreme risk by a bunch of whiney-@ssed, Liberal, anti-Americans whose collective chance of overall survival compares to that of a wingless fly.

      • A country named the US will survive, what we are fighting about is will it be a country we want to live in?

  2. PS: Will someone kindly wake me up when this oxygen theif is behind bars?

    Thanking you in advance,

    NorseRadish

    • Obama, master of the art of the taqiyya.

      While I tend to wholeheartedly agree with you, Runner7500. The depth of deception involved here goes well beyond whatever utterly reprehensible tactics of mere taqiyya.

      PS: Welcome aboard, Runner7500!

  3. On today’s call-in lines, at least one caller felt that the FBI had every reason to excuse the Clinton server security violations because the FBI needed protection from its own lapses.
    https://www.c-span.org/video/?440580-4/washington-journal-chris-farrell-discusses-release-house-intelligence-memo
    February 5, 2018 – Chris Farrell on the Release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo Chris Farrell talked about the Trump administration’s release of a secret memo written by House Intelligence Committee Republican aides on the FBI’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

    • This is from the transcript, which is auto-generated on the CSPAN page, and comes in CAPS:
      00:25:27
      CALLER
      HI, GUYS. YOU KNOW, I APPRECIATE ALL THE FINE LEGAL POINTS THAT YOU ARE DISCUSSING HERE. BUT FOR ME, THIS ALL REVOLVES AROUND MOTIVATION. AND WHEN YOU LOOK BACK AT WHAT HAPPENED, NOT JUST REGARDS TO THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION OR THE FISA COURT SITUATION, BUT RATHER THE ENTIRETY OF WHAT HAPPENED IN THE MONTHS LEADING UP TO THE ELECTION, WE SAW PLAINLY THAT THERE IS SOMETHING VERY WRONG GOING ON IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT — EXCUSE ME, IN THE F.B.I. BECAUSE ON THE 5th OF JULY OF 2016, MR. COMEY STOOD UP AND TOLD ALL OF US ALL THE CRIMES HILLARY CLINTON COMMITTED AND THEN TOLD US THERE WOULD BE NO INDICTMENT FOR ALL THESE CRIMES. THEN THE FOLLOWING DAY, WHEN TREY TREY GOWDY WAS QUESTIONING HIM, TREY GOWDY WAS SAYING, DID MRS. CLINTON COMMIT THIS CRIME THAT VIOLATED THIS STATUTE, COMEY SAID, YES D. SHE COMMIT THAT CRIME AND COMEY SAID YES, AND STILL THERE WAS NOT GOING TO BE ANY INDICTMENT. WE KNEW AT THAT POINT SOMETHING HAD HAPPENED AT THE F.B.I. THAT WE REALLY, AS A NATION, DIDN’T WANT TO FACE. I HAVE —

      00:26:14
      Christopher J. Farrell
      EXCELLENT POINT BY THE CALLER. MR. COMEY’S PRESS BRIEFING ON THE 5th OF JULY, HE ESSENTIALLY FOR THE FIRST 13 AND A HALF MINUTES OF THE 15-MINUTE BRIEFING, HE LAID OUT ALL OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE CRIME OF 18USC SECTION 793 F, MISHANDLING NATIONAL DEFENSE INFORMATION. IDENTIFIED EACH ELEMENT OF THE CRIME. HE GAVE EXAMPLES OF HOW MRS. CLINTON AND HER CIRCLE OF ASSOCIATES VIOLATED THAT, QUITE SPECIFICALLY. AND THEN TOWARDS THE END, HE INVENTED, OUT OF THIN AIR, A NEW ELEMENT, WHICH WAS INTENT. THAT PARTICULAR CRIME THAT I JUST HIGHLIGHTED, I DON’T WANT TO KEEP REPEATING, BUT IT IS IMPORTANT, THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR INTENT IN THAT PARTICULAR MISHANDLING OF NATIONAL DEFENSE INFORMATION. IT IS KIND OF UNIQUE, NOT ENTIRELY, BUT UNUSUAL, NO REQUIREMENT FOR INTENT. HE MANUFACTURED A NEW STANDARD OR NEW THRESHOLD FOR SATISFYING THE ELEMENT OF THE CRIME. THEN WENT WAY BEYOND THE SCOPE AS AN INVESTIGATOR AND MADE THE DECISION OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND SAID, NO, WE’RE NOT GOING TO PROSECUTE IT. IS — IT IS ABHORRENT, NOTHING ELSE LIKE IT IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE HISTORY, NOWHERE.