(This woman appears to be trying to use many of the tools created by the cultural Marxists against themselves. It will be interesting to see if that works as they were tools designed to be selectively enforced for the purpose of the narrative)
Dr. Denise Dalaimo Nussbaum, Chair of the Sociology Department, distinguished author and professor, is suing the Governing Board of Mount San Jacinto Community College for 9.5 million dollars for “assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, gender discrimination, failure to prevent discrimination and harassment, violation of constitutional and statutory rights of free speech and political activities, retaliation, tortious interference with law enforcement investigation, and breach of fiduciary duty.”
I think she should sue for more—far more—since this long-time tenured professor now faces a potentially dangerous and hostile work environment.
Her crime? She is a Zionist and proud of it. More importantly, she is a great believer in objective truth. This is currently out of fashion on so many American campuses when the subject of Israel, Palestine, and Islam are discussed. Dr. Nussbaum is also a feminist—and this figures in this story as well. Her love of truth, love of Zion, and love of freedom for women and minorities are anathema to those who have attacked her.
What is going on?
Pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel Brownshirts are growing more and more aggressive on North American campuses. They support “hate speech” and “blood libels” but in the name of “free speech.” They claim “academic freedom” to do so. But they behave in absolutely uncivilized ways.
(One might imagine that people who planned to pack their bags and empty their accounts and liquidate their assets to move themselves and their families to another country might spend 5 minutes reading about that place before they actually committed to it, let alone started the trip)
Swedish authorities were called on Wednesday to remove a group of refugees who have refused to get off a bus after being taken to a village three days ago, saying it was “too cold” and isolated.
“There are 14 people inside and around the buses who don’t want to move into the [asylum] centre,” Migration Agency spokeswoman Maria Lofgren told AFP.
“The bus company has called the Swedish Enforcement Authority,” Lofgren said. The authority acts as bailiffs during evictions.
3. Teenagers face jail for tearing Turkish president posters
(In North Korea abusing a photo of the leader results in an automatic THREE GENERATION sentence in a slave labour camp. As there is a picture of the dear leader in every publication in the North end of the Korean peninsula, its pretty hard to not abuse one in some way. So I guess 4 years for tearing a photo of Erdogan is pretty lenient on the Kim Jong scale. But Europe should really start building more better fences)
4. Austrian new army chaplain speaks to crowd. Notice there is no rabbi, priest, minister, Buddhist monk or zen master to be seen anywhere.
(Nash tells us the translation is general religious sounds. Nothing in there that is worthy of translation that I am aware of)
6. I quite like Brian Lilley. He is one of the most refreshing and genuinely brave journalists left in Canada. But in the following video he did, I think he missed the central problem with the issue:
Why post a thing about a pop culture movie? Cultural Marxism is all about using the culture to destroy classical civilization and this is a great example of how, and with an important parallel which was very effective recently.
To begin with, why would any group agitate to transform a thing into what it isn’t? Can that possibly have anything to do with gay or men-pretending-to-be-women’s rights? Clearly not because at any time anyone, and I mean ANYONE can write their own story and make their own movie with a gay, female, or surgically costumed man who now sort of looks like a woman in the superficial way, as a British spy. So it can’t be about rights since they already have that right, just like, yes thats right, just like redefining marriage to include 2 people of the same sex has nothing to do with rights whatsoever. Gay marriage rights means that people of the same sex can form a legal commitment with the same rights and responsibilities, short of biological reality of course, as a heterosexual couple can even though it can’t really mean the same thing. Gay marriage as the debate was framed, was about the deconstruction of actual marriage in order to help bring down classical civilization. It worked rather well actually.
Recently I heard a successful middle aged divorced business man say: “Marriage is for kids and gay people”. Yes, it was a joke but the joke works because it reflects a transformation of the institution. As an aside, that man shortly after remarried a woman.
So back to the Bond film. It clearly cannot be about gay rights as anyone can make a gay, female, or man-with-silicone-sacks-and-no-testes British Spy movie any time they want. But they don’t want that, they want to deconstruct Bond as a successful, classical liberal, Normal-sexual role model in order to destroy they idea of normalcy in the minds of the public. Brian Lilley may or may not have missed that but he didn’t say it and I think that was the real point of the effort. Not rights, but destruction of everything at the core of what makes our civilization not just work, but an order of magnitude better than anything else the world has ever known, and likely will know again as we slide back into theocratic and tribal barbarism.