Islamic Geopolitics, WW3 escalates and Islamic infiltration and colonization accelerates to the West: Links 1 on April 21 – 2015

1. Two Birmingham teachers accused of beating 10-year-old boy for making mistakes as he recited Koran

Two Islamic teachers will stand trial accused of repeatedly beating a ten-year-old boy – for wrongly reciting the Koran.

Mohammed Waqar, 23, and Mohammed Siddique, 60, are accused of assaulting the youngster at the UK Islamic Mission’s (UKIM) Jamia Mosque in Sparkbrook, Birmingham.

The boy was allegedly slapped repeatedly during religious lessons at the mosque between May 1 and June 13 last year.

Mohammed Waqar, 23, and Mohammed Siddique, 60, are accused of assaulting a youngster at the UK Islamic Mission Jamia Mosque in Sparkbrook, Birmingham. It's alleged was allegedly slapped repeatedly for mistakes in his studies, including not reciting the Koran correctly during religious lessons at the mosque in Sparkbrook

(In a small way I sympathize with these teachers. Every time I hear muslims recite the verse taken from the Jerusalem Talmud koran 5:32 in an incomplete out of context way to make it look like its saying something nice, it makes one want to lash out a little. Here is an explanatory article)

2. Top Iranian General: Nuclear Inspectors Will Not be Permitted

(What makes this news is that they are saying it out loud)

The deputy head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps categorically rejected any international inspectors on any Iranian military bases as part of the nuclear deal.

Brigadier-General Hossein Salami told Iran’s state-run Press TV “They will not even be permitted to inspect the most normal military site in their dreams.”

“Visiting a military base by a foreign inspector would mean the occupation of our land because all our defense secrets are there” Salami said. “Even talking about the subject means national humiliation.”

3. Grinning rapist finally jailed almost SIX years after attacking teenage girl, 14, as police admit ‘unacceptable delays and failures’ allowed him to live freely near his victim

4. Number of Canadians drawn to overseas jihad is rising, CSIS head says

The number of Canadians drawn to overseas conflict zones in Iraq and Syria is surging despite authorities’ efforts to stem the outflow, Canada’s top spy says.

Michel Coulombe, head of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, told a Parliamentary hearing on Monday the number of known Canadian extremists who have travelled to fight in the two countries spiked as much as 50 per cent in the past four months.

5. Streets of Yemen today

6. Yemen conflict escalates: 2 more U.S. Navy warships sent near coast

(The narration says that the US has sent these ships in case the situation in Yemen worsens. I would like to see the definition of ‘worsens’ in this context)

7. Here is an odd sort of a story. A former US servicewoman, who apparently also VLCScreenSnapz017did a pictorial in Playboy, was arrested for stopping some people from desecrating a US flag at a protest. I get it. People have a right to protest and she had a right to object but not take their flag away. After all, the flag is just a symbol of the country she served in the forces and thats all. Just cloth and ink. But who were the people trampling on it and why? Also, what would happen if she had stomped on and burned a koran. After all thats just paper and ink. A symbol of islamic religion. There are hundreds of millions of them in the world I’m sure. Whole deciduous forests have probably been turned into paper to print korans. Yet somehow I suspect that suddenly it would be viewed as a hate crime and she would have been arrested for that.

Granted, the US is not yet like the UK where most certainly that would have happened. There are very few instances where it has, and where it has, a kind of slight of hand gets used such as the man in Dearborn who burned a koran and was arrested for some kind of fire ordinance breach.  But the hate crime application as a work-around for the 1st amendment is likely on its way given US signature on UN Resolution 16/18

8. Obama and Erdogan to open massive mosque complex in Maryland

(The Right Scoop has a lot more)

9. This press release by Frank Gaffney’s group, Center for Security Policy needs to be spread.

Excerpt:

Muslim Colonization of America: The Hijra and the Hijacking of America’s Refugee Resettlement Program

Washington, DC — Last week, the chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security, Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, wrote the Department of State demanding that it halt the resettlement of refugees in the city of Spartanburg in his district. In his letter dated April 15, 2015, Congressman Gowdy objected to the “lack of notice, information and consultation afforded to me and my constituents” and posed seventeen pointed questions, including (as paraphrased by Politico):

  • Why and when was his district approved [as a refugee resettlement site]?
  • What steps were taken to notify local government officials and whether they approved the plan, and where funds for the office and the refugees will come from?
  • When are the first refugees expected to arrive?
  • What benefits are they entitled to?
  • How many will be resettled?
  • What is their country of origin?
  • Who is responsible for housing, employment and education services for them?

Rep. Gowdy was particularly concerned about the security implications of this immigrant migration. He asked: “Do any of the refugees to be resettled in the Spartanburg area have criminal convictions? If so, for what crimes has each been convicted?” And “Please explain the background-check process performed on refugees scheduled to be resettled in Spartanburg.”

Thank you M., Buck, Richard, GoV., CB Sashenka, and all who helped out with this post. More to come today.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

13 Replies to “Islamic Geopolitics, WW3 escalates and Islamic infiltration and colonization accelerates to the West: Links 1 on April 21 – 2015”

  1. 2 and 6 are related, the movement of ships to intercept the Iranian convoy could be to help Saudi, or it could be to help Iran. Looks like we are finally going to see which side Obama really supports.

  2. As I commented over at GOV I appreciate Mr. Gowdy’s concern for his home district. However, this is a national problem. So, the Federal gov’t is blocked from sending the “refugees” to Mr. Gowdy’s district. The gov’t will then pick another area to force these people on.
    Will Mr. Gowdy fight as strongly to keep these “refugees” out of EVERY COMMUNITY IN AMERICA? After all, if he doesn’t want them in his home district, why would he want them in any district across America?

  3. 1/ For true masochists not sick to death of 5:32 yet, here is some commentary from Quran Tafsir Ibn Kathir, from a website set up by these people:

    http://www.islamtomorrow.com/aboutus.asp

    They say about themselves:

    ‘We’re American Muslims here in the United States who have come to Islam. It is our pleasure and privilege to serve Allah by spreading the true message of Pure Islam without cultural, traditional or nationalistic prejudices and corruption.’

    From their introduction to Tafsir Ibn Kathir:

    ‘All too often we are hearing from both Muslims and Non-Muslims; ‘The Quran says this-or-that and the Quran means so-and-so’ without giving reference to their actual source for meaning and understanding.

    ‘Many misconceptions, misquotes, misunderstandings and misrepresentations are tossed around in the media, news and public discussions about Islam and what it teaches.

    ‘The solution is to go back to the original source in the original language as understood by the people who first heard the Quran from the lips of the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, along with his own definitions and explanations….

    ‘The Tafsir of Ibn Kathir is of the most respected and accepted explanations for the Quran and is the most widely used explanations in Arabic used today.’

    http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php

    From the commentary on 5:32

    Ali bin Abi Talhah reported that Ibn `Abbas said, “It is as Allah has stated, (if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind.) Saving life in this case occurs by not killing a soul that Allah has forbidden. So this is the meaning of saving the life of all mankind, for whoever forbids killing a soul without justification, the lives of all people will be saved from him.” Similar was said by Mujahid; (And if anyone saved a life…) means, he refrains from killing a soul. Al-`Awfi reported that Ibn `Abbas said that Allah’s statement, (it would be as if he killed all mankind. .) means, “Whoever kills one soul that Allah has forbidden killing, is just like he who kills all mankind.” Sa`id bin Jubayr said, “He who allows himself to shed the blood of a Muslim, is like he who allows shedding the blood of all people. He who forbids shedding the blood of one Muslim, is like he who forbids shedding the blood of all people.” In addition, Ibn Jurayj said that Al-A`raj said that Mujahid commented on the Ayah, (it would be as if he killed all mankind,) “He who kills a believing soul intentionally, Allah makes the Fire of Hell his abode, He will become angry with him, and curse him, and has prepared a tremendous punishment for him, equal to if he had killed all people, his punishment will still be the same.”

    http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=786&Itemid=60

    (The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land.) `Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Mischief in the land refers to various types of evil.

    Abu Dawud and An-Nasa’i recorded that `Ikrimah said that Ibn `Abbas said that the Ayah, (The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land…) “Was revealed concerning the idolators, those among them who repent before being apprehended, they will still be liable for punishment for the crimes they committed.” The correct opinion is that this Ayah is general in meaning and includes the idolators and all others who commit the types of crimes the Ayah mentioned.

    http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=784&Itemid=60

    • In other words, it is never about ‘all mankind.’ There is always, always, a distinction between Muslims and non-Muslims, between potentially innocent and never innocent, between who can be saved and who can’t, between who can be killed and who can’t. But anyone reading here already knows that. They are simply still confident they can count on the population at large not finding out, whether willfully or from laziness or indifference.

      • Ibn Kathir on the meaning of mischief:

        In his Tafsir, As-Suddi said that Ibn ` Abbas and Ibn Mas`ud commented, (And when it is said to them: Do not make mischief on the earth, ” they say: “We are only peacemakers. ”) “They are the hypocrites. As for, (“Do not make mischief on the earth”), that is disbelief and acts of disobedience.” Abu Ja` far said that Ar-Rabi` bin Anas said that Abu Al-` Aliyah said that Allah’s statement , (And when it is said to them: “Do not make mischief on the earth, ”), means, “Do not commit acts of disobedience on the earth. Their mischief is disobeying Allah, because whoever disobeys Allah on the earth, or commands that Allah be disobeyed, he has commit ted mischief on the earth. Peace on both the earth and in the heavens is ensured (and earned) through obedience (to Allah). ” Ar-Rabi` bin Anas and Qatadah said similarly.

      • Thanks for the suggestion. I keep thinking I won’t read any more of it, then the brazenness gets to me.