Interesting article on the implementation of sharia laws in Malaysia over non-muslims

On another post today, a short discussion took place about how muslims reinvent the word ‘defend’ as a rhetorical trick to justify out-and-out attacking people, arguing that it is defending the religion, to use force to make islam and sharia law the supreme organizing principle over non-muslims.

Please read this article about the pending implementation of sharia in another state within Malaysia and notice how the logic of the advocates is similar, if adjusted to the circumstances. One example:

  Abdullah was responding to the stand of non-Muslims in Kelantan who are opposing the implementation of hudud in the PAS-governed state.

He said non-Muslims should not be so greedy to the point that they want to interfere with the exclusive rights and interests of the Malays and Bumiputera, who are the original inhabitants of the country.

Non-Muslims, he argues, are being greedy by expecting the continued (nearly) equal rights under the law when they should expect to be dhimmis as it is ‘rightfully’ an Islamic nation. Of course to muslims, “the whole world is a mosque” so there is a rational for the conquest and forcing of Islamic supremacy and sharia world-wide.

The logic is very similar to classic islamic logic which justifies attacking autonomous non-muslims in order to force sharia and islamic supremacy on all.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

10 Replies to “Interesting article on the implementation of sharia laws in Malaysia over non-muslims”

  1. Non-government employees, she argues, are being greedy by expecting the continued (nearly) equal rights under the law when they should expect to be preferentially discriminated against as it is ‘rightfully’ a Socialist nation. Of course to government sector workers, “the whole world is a one world State” so there is a rational for the conquest and forcing of Socialist supremacy and hate-crimes world-wide.

    The logic is very similar to classic Communist logic which justifies attacking autonomous non dependant citizens in order to force Diversity and Socialist supremacy on all.

  2. These dirty fork-tongued scumbags are twisting language with the sole intention of deceiving us all. Manipulation of language is a cheap trick that Leftists do as well. It’s all part of the same Orwellian theme.
    Islam, Marxism, Nazism and all based upon lies. The Muslims refer to it as ‘taqiyya’ and the Secular tyrants may refer to it as something else, such as political correctness. Whatever it is referred to as, it’s all the same – lies, lies, lies.

    Freedom=slavery.
    Defend=attack.
    Liberate=oppress
    Peace=war.

  3. When Greenfield says “left” he may as well be saying “Palestinian”.
    (Or I’ve been reading too much about this latest “peace process” debacle.)

  4. I guess about both then.
    At least this round is finished, to everyone’s relief. Now the principals can go back to living together, working it out their own way.