Muslims to Sweden: “You have just seen the beginning”

Ah the sweet sweet peace that enrichment brings. La La La La.

Before you read the current news, you may want to read this Fjordman piece from 2005 on the same suburb.

An excerpt:

In Husby, a Stockholm suburb, gangs of immigrant youngsters are harassing other visitors who come to use the swimming pool. A Swedish school class was attacked and robbed by a large group of teenage boys shouting “Swedish bastards!(Svennejävlar) You don’t belong here!”

The police in Husby are aware of the problem, but say it is an integration problem that the police can’t solve alone. In another case, some twenty youths armed with iron rods and chains smashed the Hjulsta school in Stockholm. They also threatened and attacked several of the pupils. Neither the students nor the teachers dare testify to the police about the incident. Their fears are well-founded, as threats against witnesses in Swedish court cases have quadrupled between 2000 and 2003.

H/T Snaphanen.Dk

Gates of Vienna has this thorough post up

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

15 Replies to “Muslims to Sweden: “You have just seen the beginning””

  1. What the police really need is that new skunk spray recently developed by the Israelis. That way the trouble makers can be easily identified later. Just a thought…

  2. Humans are naturally tribal. A tribe or people though can never achieve civilization if they live by the ethos of an “eye for an eye”. Arab tribes, even before Islam, lived by the principle of even “two eyes for an eye”. In fact, they went one better, and took revenge for future acts of violence they knew would be visited on them sooner or later. Islam merely codified these traditions.

    Thus a vicious cycle of revenge and greater counter-revenge, was automatic in all societies that live by the ethos of an “eye for an eye”. In such societies, a civilized nation, that is one that lives by the rule of law, can never take birth.

    Now it is known, that Europe was inhabited by some of the fiercest tribes known in history ( Vandals, Vikings, Berserkers etc). We know from Roman historians that Rome faced its most fierce and ruthless enemies, not from Arab people, but from the north of Europe. The fall of Rome was not due to Arabs or Jews, but these same barbarians – mainly Germanic tribes.

    What happened soon after was nothing short of a miraculous. Europe, in a very short period of time, in what is now known as the Dark ages, was imbued by an ethos that preached a diametrically opposite ethos never seen anywhere in the world before. This ethos is easily stated but hard to practice.

    1. Love your neighbour as yourself
    2. Love your enemies. Do good to those that hate you.
    3. Frgive those that hate you.
    4. Render unto Caesar things that belong to Caesar etc – which led to our present secular society.

    Slowly first, then increasingly quickly, the ever increasing vicious cycle of revenge and counter-revenge that was in Europe, became a virtuous cycle of letting the law takes its course.

    The problem we have now is that we have imported millions of tribal people who believe in an “eye or an eye”, into a society that does not subscribe to that ethos. Any criticism of Islam automatically unleashes an “eye for an eye” reaction, also known as defensive Jihad.

  3. oognhand

    Muslims wont though as they have the example of Mohammed.

    We in the West, even though many are not Christians, are imbued with Christian values of not taking revenge ie an “eye for an eye”. Thus, by and large, revenge and counter-revenge does not take place in the West.

    My fear is that against aggressive Islam that always attacks first, and regards restraint as sign of weakness, many will start taking revenge. In effect, even if we don’t become Muslims, we will have gone back to the tribal ethos and start behaving like Muslims. The civil state will thus come to an end.

    What to do?

    1. Repatriate Muslims, innocent civilians or not.

    2. Stop immigration of Muslims to the West – good, but locking the stable door comes to mind

    3. Re-constitute the caliphate, and then start a hot/cold.

    4. Civilise Muslims, i.e, do what Christianity did in Europe.

  4. Given enough provocation the Europeans will revert to their savage ancestors actions, all it takes is time and enough provocation. What people need to remember is that less then 75 years ago the northern white Europeans put murder on an assembly line, doesn’t anyone think their descendents are not still capable of doing this?

  5. But there is still the theological problem for Muslims that their tribal revenge ethos is closer to Pagan values than to Christian values, while in general Islam considers Christianity to be morally superior to Paganism. And theological problems have their consequences for the Afterlife.
    The problem is that the Left has made a civil, democratic solution impossible, by branding all Anti-Islam parties as “racists”, thus “fascists”, and therefore a threat to democracy. And “fascists”, of course, should be dealt a dose of their anti-democratic medicine. How to save democracy from Islam, if all attempts are seen as “fascist”? You cannot. Islam has the West, that is, Judeo-Christian-Humanist society, checkmate. Only by being MORE underhanded than the Left, you can win. Always stress that regardless how much the Left does for the Islam, its menfolk cannot have relations with Muslim womenfolk.
    http://oogenhand.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/hoodie-boy-and-hijab-girl/

  6. @Richard “Given enough provocation the Europeans will revert to their savage ancestors actions, all it takes is time and enough provocation.”
    Maybe that’s the only way that Europe can be saved but time is not on your side given the Muslim demographic time bomb and the demise of the family and child-bearing among Europeans.

  7. Gerald, don’t fall in love with the threat, population is but one factor to take into consideration in picking a winner in a war. What you have to remember is that the vast majority of Islamic victories came during the time of swords, spears and bows, once gun powder weapons came in with their reliance on disciplined action by groups of soldiers the Moslems started losing. So far we in the west haven’t really been fighting back, it is easy to predict victory when only one side is fighting. The factors shift in our favor when we start fighting.

  8. oogenhand I was talking about their actions in violence not in stupidity, even if the Nazi’s were fond of Islam that doesn’t mean their descendents will be.

Leave a Reply to oogenhand Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

*