I have sent the clip mentioned in this article out for translation for titles. We shall see if it can be managed. In the meantime, as the British say…
H/T Don L
From Gatestone Inst:
by Raymond Ibrahim
July 12, 2012 at 4:30 am
As a possibly convenient way of rationalizing what one desires while still being able to feel “pure,” anything and everything that is otherwise banned becomes permissible. All that supposedly matters is one’s intention, or niyya.
Not only did the original “underwear bomber” Abdullah Hassan al-Asiri hide explosives in his rectum to assassinate Saudi Prince Muhammad bin Nayef—they met in 2009 after the 22-year-old holy warrior “feigned repentance for his jihadi views“—but al-Asiri apparently had fellow jihadis repeatedly sodomize him to “widen” his anus in order to accommodate the explosives— all in accordance with the fatwas [religious edicts] of Islamic clerics.
A 2010 Arabic news video that is making the rounds on the Internet gives the details. Apparently a cleric, one Abu al-Dema al-Qasab, informed jihadis of an “innovative and unprecedented way to execute martyrdom operations: place explosive capsules in your anus. However, to undertake this jihadi approach you must agree to be sodomized for a while to widen your anus so it can hold the explosives.”
Others inquired further by asking for formal fatwas. Citing his desire for “martyrdom and the virgins of paradise,” one jihadi, (possibly al-Asiri himself) asked another sheikh, “Is it permissible for me to let one of the jihadi brothers sodomize me to widen my anus if the intention is good?”
After praising Allah, the sheikh’s fatwa began by declaring that sodomy is forbidden in Islam,
However, jihad comes first, for it is the pinnacle of Islam, and if the pinnacle of Islam can only be achieved through sodomy, then there is no wrong in it.
This speaks for itself.
“Prison sex” (not gay sex, mahoundians will tell you) is as muslim as worshipping the kaaba.
As time passes, islam gets weirder and weirder, stupider and stupider. When one thinks they’ve seen it all concerning islam and muslims in general, something like this comes along, confounding all expectations. Sometimes one just has to laugh in order to maintain a sense of levity in the face of all this islamo-bufoonery.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuEK9gSUbWw&w=420&h=315%5D
The thing is, if you accept the premise that a potential bomber’s anus needs stretching to accommodate more explosives, then why is it that the only way to stretch it is with another man’s penis? For one thing, given what I suspect about Muslim terrorists, there won’t be much stretching going on that way and secondly, why not just use a stick or a traffic cone or something. Why was that the default fatwa?
I guess it all boils down to, ‘What would Mohammed do’?
@Eeyore:
Yes, that irony occured to me too. It obviously gives them the proverbial green light to fulfill latent homosexual desires without worry of Hellfire. Consider this, the submissive, so-called “bottom” role is the one likely to get the most grief or blame in the hypocritical eyes of muslims with their sexually dualistic mentality. The dominant role being filled by an alpha male, the penetrator, so to speak, traditionally has a certain level of plausable denial concerning his sexual orientation in muslim societies. In this way the alpha male can deny being a homosexual, an option not available to the submissive role. In the service of jihad however, all that is cast aside, to be rendered permissable if it furthers the cause of Allah.
Islam is one sick, twisted, and pathologically depraved pseudo-faith.
It is sick, and the more they do things like this the more people who are going wake up to the danger.
I am aware of the prison sex in the Muslim world. Why is heterosexual deviance prevented by heavy penalties AND separation of the sexes, and homosexual deviance ONLY with heavy penalties? Why not the other way around, that is, prevent homosexual deviance by heavy penalties AND mixing of the sexes, and heterosexual deviance ONLY with heavy penalties? I am beginning to think that Islam, and to a lesser extent other religions who separate the sexes, are fundamentally screwed. If these religions are right, and sex is meant for reproduction, then it logically follows that abortion is worse than the Holocaust. If abortion is murder, why don’t they castrate themselves? After all, they say that people who believe in overpopulation should start with themselves by killing themselves. Then I say, if you believe abortion is murder, start with yourself, and castrate yourself. Only by castration you are REALLY sure you won’t cause unwanted pregnancy. Improve the world, start with yourself. On the other hand, people who believe in overpopulation do not have to commit suicide or the like. We simply reverse the double standard of the Pro-“Life”scum. If you oppose abortion, give the right example, and castrate yourself. If you believe in overpopulation, you are perfectly entitled to castrate and abort the large families; after all, they are the cancer tumors that destroy the world.
Personally, I wish they’d all have their anuses stretched and fitted with explosives. I would be happy to hit the switch.