7 Replies to “German sociologist: ‘It is necessary to criticize Islam’”
Things are moving in the right direction. Muslims will try to use logic to equate “Islamophobia” with Anti-Semitism, but the common people are not logical, and not swayed by their arguments.
This man is too sensible!
Ps, I would comment on your site more if it would remember my WordPress ID. I can’t remember my password, tried 4 times. Having to type in your email every time is very annoying from mobiles.
A breath of fresh air from academia. Nice to hear someone talk without screaming Leftards butting in.
Not bad – but he speaks too dense, he needs to slowly and deliberately move from issue to issue.
The question that arises here is again – what is Islam? If it is just a religion then why does it – like the man said – mix law and state with religion.
My opinion is that religion IS a mix of spirit, law and politics and what we call religion should actually be called faith or spirituality and not religion.
Another good definition of religion would be a monolithic approach towards life from one single direction – this would make it much easier to call Buddhism and Communism religious – since both followers are different from Humanists and Conservatists in that they choose not to include anything else in there system.
Bobbejane says:
“but he speaks too dense, he needs to slowly and deliberately move from issue to issue.”
But then he would be accused of being a right-wing lunatic
@OxAO
Leftist are by there very nature insecure around people who have an aura of intellectual superiority – that’s why this man would appear a right-wing lunatic if he spoke more carefully and packed less information in his speech.
This is a tip: If you want to talk about right-wing issues to a leftist, use difficult words, complex sentences with several points of reference and make use of quotations from obscure and semi-political writers.
If he doesn’t speak this way the left will ignore him, most will anyway but some moderates will start listening.
Discover more from Vlad Tepes
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Things are moving in the right direction. Muslims will try to use logic to equate “Islamophobia” with Anti-Semitism, but the common people are not logical, and not swayed by their arguments.
This man is too sensible!
Ps, I would comment on your site more if it would remember my WordPress ID. I can’t remember my password, tried 4 times. Having to type in your email every time is very annoying from mobiles.
A breath of fresh air from academia. Nice to hear someone talk without screaming Leftards butting in.
Not bad – but he speaks too dense, he needs to slowly and deliberately move from issue to issue.
The question that arises here is again – what is Islam? If it is just a religion then why does it – like the man said – mix law and state with religion.
My opinion is that religion IS a mix of spirit, law and politics and what we call religion should actually be called faith or spirituality and not religion.
Another good definition of religion would be a monolithic approach towards life from one single direction – this would make it much easier to call Buddhism and Communism religious – since both followers are different from Humanists and Conservatists in that they choose not to include anything else in there system.
Bobbejane says:
“but he speaks too dense, he needs to slowly and deliberately move from issue to issue.”
But then he would be accused of being a right-wing lunatic
@OxAO
Leftist are by there very nature insecure around people who have an aura of intellectual superiority – that’s why this man would appear a right-wing lunatic if he spoke more carefully and packed less information in his speech.
This is a tip: If you want to talk about right-wing issues to a leftist, use difficult words, complex sentences with several points of reference and make use of quotations from obscure and semi-political writers.
If he doesn’t speak this way the left will ignore him, most will anyway but some moderates will start listening.