5 Replies to “Does citizens having guns make a place safer?”
Yes, it will. Are Muslims allowed to have guns in Saudi-Arabia? God will destroy Saudi-Arabia by internal corruption. The religious police should have their right hands cut off, as well as those of their sons. If they resist, they will burn eternally in hell. The proof of my religion is the civil war in Syria.
We’ve been infested!
Read the book:
More Guns, Less Crime
John Lott .jr
ISBN: 0-226-49363-6
Think…..if you ran the risk of getting your head blown off by the woman whose car you’re trying to jack……..perhaps you would be less, considerably less enthusiastic..
Regards, Don Laird
Edson, Alberta, Canada
Don read this one,
To Keep and Bear Arms: The Origins of an Anglo-American Right
ISBN-10: 0674893077 | ISBN-13: 978-0674893078
this one goes into the history of the right to keep and bear arms.
Those who are in sovereign control of arms are in a sovereign position to decide whether the constitution is to continue or not. – Aristotle c.334-23 BC.
This shouldn’t even be a question. As Aristotle points out it is based on our basic right to survive.
For it to be a question even after 2300 years means we have learned nothing.
Discover more from Vlad Tepes
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Yes, it will. Are Muslims allowed to have guns in Saudi-Arabia? God will destroy Saudi-Arabia by internal corruption. The religious police should have their right hands cut off, as well as those of their sons. If they resist, they will burn eternally in hell. The proof of my religion is the civil war in Syria.
We’ve been infested!
Read the book:
More Guns, Less Crime
John Lott .jr
ISBN: 0-226-49363-6
Think…..if you ran the risk of getting your head blown off by the woman whose car you’re trying to jack……..perhaps you would be less, considerably less enthusiastic..
Regards, Don Laird
Edson, Alberta, Canada
Don read this one,
To Keep and Bear Arms: The Origins of an Anglo-American Right
ISBN-10: 0674893077 | ISBN-13: 978-0674893078
this one goes into the history of the right to keep and bear arms.
Those who are in sovereign control of arms are in a sovereign position to decide whether the constitution is to continue or not. – Aristotle c.334-23 BC.
This shouldn’t even be a question. As Aristotle points out it is based on our basic right to survive.
For it to be a question even after 2300 years means we have learned nothing.