How to enrage a savage

“Twas a toon, that stirred the mustard”  – Vlad Tepes Blog may 3 2012

 

Germany May 1 2012

How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.

Winston Churchill 1899

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

9 Replies to “How to enrage a savage”

  1. When Jerusalem was conquered by the Crusaders during the middle ages, Arab Muslims, Christains and Jews were massacred. They spared no body. After 100 years when Jerusalem was reoccupied by the Muslims, not a single Christian and a Jew was slaughtered. Saladin should be taught in European and American schools.Saladin should be included in European curricula, says Thorvald Steen.

    Leading Norwegian writer has criticized the education given to children in European schools, saying it is misleading and arguing that a Kurdish-Muslim commander “who opened Jerusalem to all religions” after conquering it over 800 years ago should be presented as a childhood hero for them.

    “He was an enormously important figure, and he is not mentioned in our books,” said Thorvald Steen about Salah ad-Din Yusuf ibn Ayyub — better known as Saladin in the West — who defeated and took Jerusalem back from the Crusaders in the battle of Hattin in 118. He did not seek revenge though his generals wanted it greatly after 87 years of oppression and depression at the hands of Crusaders. He could easily smash the entire city, but he did not do that and took a rather tolerant and peaceful approach, Saladin, a devout Sunni Muslim, united Muslims against the Crusaders in Jerusalem and formed a huge army famous for its chivalry which was also supported by minority Christians and Jews at the time.

    Richard the Lionheart was profoundly affected by Saladin’s pluralist and tolerant personality. Following a direct order from Pope Gregory VIII, Richard the Lionheart led the third crusader army against Saladin in 1191 after he’d conquered Jerusalem four years earlier. “The real provocation for the pope was that Saladin opened Jerusalem to all religions,” Steen said, arguing that the “pope’s teaching at the time was ‘You crusaders must bring Saladin’s head to Rome, and the more non-Christians you kill the faster you rise to paradise.

    Though he managed to defeat Saladin’s army in the battle of Arsuf, Richard the Lionheart failed to retake Jerusalem from him, eventually returning home after coming to an agreement with the Muslim commander for Jerusalem to stay under Muslim control but be open for Christian pilgrims. “Richard was a cruel fundamentalist, but he became a confused fundamentalist after discovering that the world is much different than what he thought,” Steen noted, adding, “Richard was shocked about Saladin, who he thought the devil’s man being at such a high level.” The Norwegian author argued, however, that intense propaganda was carried out in Europe to exalt the Richard the Lionheart after his death. Steen stressed that the reason William Shakespeare did not write about Richard the Lionheart is because “he is too perfect to write about in Shakespeare’s style where characters are represented with their good and bad sides together.” The way he presented Saladin has been admired, especially among Muslims.

    UNO has taken a right decision to hand over Jerusalam to Muslims because they are going to do justice and tolerate and respoect those who are differnt. Still one of the shrine of Jesus(peace be upon him) is under the control of Muslims who give it full respect and honour.
    Iftikhar Ahmad
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

  2. Iftikhar Ahmad

    I agree with you. That so totally explains why non-muslim communities are being exterminated in muslim countries, everywhere.

  3. Iftick, you truly are as your name implies, All (MAD) and a blithering idiot to boot.

    Speaking of boots, that offer of a free Doc. Martens prostate exam still stands.

    “Lan astaslem, slay all Saracens!”

  4. Actually if you want to learn how sophistry is done, read Ahmed. His material is a crash course in logical fallacies and general intellectual slight of hand and use of political correctness and double standards. That is one reason among many that I appreciate his posts.

    One cannot learn to defend against bad arguments till one encounters them.

  5. @Eeyore, your sophistry statement makes sense. I have long noticed the similarity of Iftikhar’s approach to that of Zakir Naik’s (how I loathe to affix the title, Dr. in front of his name, lol). Naik plays fast and loose with the facts, and most generously fabricates a few himself with the full knowlege that his target audience will not know the difference.

    Muslim ignorance is rampant, viral, and self-inflicted.

  6. King Richard had an agreement with Saladin which Saladin used the agreement to delay Richard’s advancement.
    Saladin Killed the captured crusader soldiers and did not hand over the holy cross as agreed.
    Richard took Saladin at his word and waited not advancing aditional 3 weeks and didn’t advance his troops as Richard should have.

    Saladin used his captured troops for a delay tactic. Richard did kill the captured presoners for what richard said was because Saladin was toying with him.

    Richard in my opinion did the right thing to kill the captured troops

    Richard the Lionheart did NOT fail to take Jerusalem he never attempted to take Jerusalem and stated why he never wanted to take Jerusalem. He did have intentions to take Egypt which is were the money was coming from to support Saladin’s armies, though that never came about.

Leave a Reply to Eeyore Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.