About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

10 Replies to “US Judge rules that Muslims have the right to attack atheist zombies”

  1. The title is misleading.

    The judge clearly ruled based on sharia law.

    The judge ruled based on guy dressing up as a bad Mohammad would be put to death and stated he was being lenient on the judgment based on Sharia law of other countries

  2. OxAO: I happen to agree with you. But in this case I want people to come to that conclusion themselves.

  3. This case should cause the left some uncomfort since they are so quick in defending these Muslims Now that they have a small taste of Sharia we will see if attitudes start to change

  4. Low-level judges such as Magistrates are NOT required to be attorneys. A bachelor’s degree and work experience usually constitute the minimum requirements for judges and magistrates, but most workers have law degrees and some are elected [link].

    In the State of Pennsylvania, Magistrate Judges have certain rules to follow and Mark Martin either is unfamiliar with these rules or blatantly ignored them as demonstrated below with Rules 2, 4, & 8

    Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges

    2. Magisterial district judges shall respect and comply with the law and shall conduct themselves at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

    4. Magisterial district judges shall be faithful to the law and maintain competence in it. They shall be unswayed by partisan interests, public clamor or fear of criticism. . .Magisterial district judges shall be patient, dignified and courteous to litigants, witnesses, lawyers and others with whom they deal in their official capacity,. . .

    8. Magisterial district judges shall disqualify themselves in a proceeding in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned . . .(1) they have a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;(c) is known by the magisterial district judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding

  5. Yes I think the libertarian side of the left will drift towards the more classically liberal at this stage.

  6. first the muslims came for the Jews, and the athiests laughed.
    then the muslims came for the Christians, and the athiests laughed.
    then the muslims came for the Buddists, and the athiests laughed.
    then the muslims came for the athiests, and noone was left to laugh.

    Welcome to the real world athiests, not really laughing matter after all, is it?

  7. Bill you hit the nail on the head. This does call for a very loud protest.

    Though I think O-Zombie-Bin-Ladens would be better. That way if people complain then they expose themselves as being pro terrorism. I’d rather dress up as a dead terrorist than a dead child molestor anyway – that’s just too creepy.