Another ‘artistic’ gutless wonder pretends to be daring.

I guess necklines are as low as they can go and still be interesting and hemlines are as high as possible without being a final gynecology exam. So unimaginative talentless wonders have to mock the one faith they know actually won’t hurt them while pretending to be so very daring.

How banal.

Hell if you want to mock the Catholics just research transubstantiation and ask some tough questions. But this public ridicule in an age where everyone knows the Catholic church if it does anything tends to bring food and medicine to those in need and gives a staggering amount of freedom to its adherents in African nations where Islam and animism are the dreadful alternatives.

Click below to read the article on FOX

Pass the anti-emetics please.

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

7 Replies to “Another ‘artistic’ gutless wonder pretends to be daring.”

  1. Just lookig at the picture, looks more like a re-enactment of a satanic ritual to me. on the other hand, who in their right mind, who doesn’t actualy get forced and paid to watch that crap, actualy watches it? Kinda makes me glad all the music I ever could or would want to listen to has already been made and is happily in my cd collection.

  2. “I guess necklines are as low as they can go and still be interesting and hemlines are as high as possible without being a final gynecology exam”

    How very apt! Little virtue in easy victory!

    No state institution or organized religion can or should ever be above ridicule or criticism however outrageous it may be!

  3. I never watch Emmy. They only award crap anyway. Music totally devoid of any soul what so ever. If I ever buy any cd it is mostly second hand and almost always older artists and bands. And if I rarely buy something more contemporary, it is never NWO stuff like they promote on Grammy anyway.

  4. When the chips were down, ie when the Jihad penetrated Europe and threatened the Islamification of Europe, it wasn’t the gutless atheist, agnostic, secular wonders that held the front and defeated the Islamic invasion. Even though outnumbered, the West was saved by devout Christian soldiers. This saved Europe and the West, and led to Western civilisation, including secularism which is a by-product of Christianity, that we now glibly take for granted.

    The West cannot save itself against a fanatic militaristic ideology such as Islam, whose adherents are guaranteed a place in the Muslim paradise if they fall, or guaranteed booty if they don’t and are victorious. Atheists etal just do not have the guts or a common binding faith that can stand up to Islam.

    If we carry on like this, then the West is finished. Don’t these atheists etal who mock Christianity know, that they will be the first ones to have their throats slit?

  5. This may be MTV garbage but, Let’s not leave out pedophilia, money laundrying and the systemic cover up of multiple major crimes by it’s clergy. The RCC elite are criminals of the worse sort.

    BTW the ” gutless atheist, agnostic, secular wonders” of the early middle ages, were called Vikings, and the “Christian” soldiers lost all of the middle east, africa, the balkans, and Spain. It wasn’t Christainity that saved western civilization, it was the gutless atheist, agnostic, secular wonders of science that the church tried so hard to repress and still does today.

    “Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die. But the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytising faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science – the science against which it had vainly struggled – the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”
    (Winston Churchill / 1874-1865)

    • First of all, great comment D. Let me answer it one bit at a time.

      1. You are right. The way the Vatican has handled the various priests involved with grotesque breaches of trust and of office is criminal as well as a number of choice other things. I would like to see these people brought to a proper secular court. No question of it. Even so, I find it risible when ‘artists’ try and enhance their reputation and sales by mocking a religious institution which they know will not do them any harm, and which they also know is out of fashion. The Dalai Lama has pretty much the exact same set of values as the pope for example, and you will not see Hollywood etc. mocking him even though he ran a fairly harsh theocracy taking the first born son of pretty much every family for the clergy much like the medieval church did. Yet he remains the king of the hippies.

      The issue of science and the church would require dueling essays I think but your view is the conventional one and I do not stridently object to it. But I think it is worth pointing out that a great deal of science came from church funded monks like Gregor Mendel, not to mention to this very day a lot of the worlds best booze. I think that amazing Belgian beer is still made by Catholic monks. Not that this makes the church a great institution, but it does contribute. Compared to Islam the church is a veritable bulwark of wisdom and kindness to children.

      As for your third point, no argument from me. Churchill was spot-on as far as Islam is concerned as he was with the Nazis.

      Eeyore

  6. As you say they attack the that won’t attack the.

    Science did help stop the Moslem, but only when applied by soldiers that were generally Christian to one degree or another. Science is wonderful but needs humans to apply it, and the ones who apply it to save civilizations generally turn out to be soldiers.