Donkey killed for adultery.

I’ll post this story as I found it, with this key that hopefully will help anyone sort out the facts of this case. As I understand it, a mans donkey cheated on him by having sex with some other Muslim , and so he had to kill it to preserve his family’s honor cause after all, it brings great shame to ones family when one’s livestock has sex with someone else. At least I think that is the issue here.

H/T Fred @ gayandright

Dearly Beloved, now dearly departed

From The

Donkey declared ‘Kari’ killed

our correspondent
Tuesday, July 19, 2011

SUKKUR: Incredible though it may sound, a donkey was declared ‘Kari’ and shot dead here in a remote area on Monday. The Jirga imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the alleged ‘Karo’.

The reports said that in Village Ghahi Khan Jatoi, a villager Ghazi Khan alias Malang shot dead his donkey on being ‘Kari’ with Sikandar Ali alias Deedo. He attempted to kill Sikander too but the alleged Karo managed to escape and surrendered himself to an influential person of the area.

Sources said the influential person summoned both the parties and imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the Karo. They said Sikander and his family were forced to pay Rs 50,000 on the spot and the remaining amount in two installments.

The sources added that the alleged Karo pleaded innocence at the Jirga, but the Jirga members paid no attention to it. Sikander’s family said he paid Rs 50,000 to save his life otherwise he would have been killed.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

5 Replies to “Donkey killed for adultery.”

  1. Adultery is absolutely not the issue. The rule is that if a person has sex with an animal the animal must be killed. I think (and please don’t think I’m a dirty suboid muzzie troll) it is also mentioned in the torah or talmud.

    But it doesn’t matter who thought it up. It’s an ancient and unfair rule no matter who thought it up first. The fact that a muslim still would follow it while a modern jew or christian would not even think of following it is significant. It’s just more proof that the majority of them have a Bronze age mentality.

  2. As this story is from Pakistan it is entirely likely that no actual crime took place and the plaintif is just engaging in extortion. It would be significant to find out if the accused was muslim, christian or hindu but I am equally sure muslims are just as nasty to each other in that moral cesspit.

Leave a Reply to jjk999 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.