Marc Lebuis of speaks to the Quebec Legislature opposing bill 59

To be perfectly clear, this is tomorrow’ newspaper for the rest of the free world. The ultimate far left-islamic work around to laws which guarantee freedom of speech and the preservation of the Enlightenment. If the Quebec ‘Human Rights Commission’ is successful in this bid to make punishable criticism of Islam, groups like the OIC etc. will be redoubling their efforts to make this happen everywhere.

My previous post on this issue in order to understand the person behind the push to end freedom of speech to criticize religious authority, and in particular, Islam can be seen here.

CBC tips its hand, shows its political underwear

The CBC actually ridicules a man who rescued many slaves under the Islamic State because he supports Stephen Harper. Yes, the CBC hatred of Harper is more important to them, than rescuing actual slaves from the most evil torturous state actors since the Ottoman Empire.

Link to Rebel Media page on this


Quebec’s bill 59. Canada’s French province runs screaming from the Enlightenment.

For the past couple of days, a Quebec law professor and former director of a George Soros funded ‘progressive-leftist’ group called Open Society Foundations, has been arguing in the Quebec legislature, that criticism of islam should not just be illegal but punishable by massive fines for a first offense and life destroying ones for a second.

The National Post editorial puts it this way:

National Post View: Quebec hate speech bill would re-establish bureaucratic despotism

Strong stuff for a national newspaper. But potentially an understatement.

As this site has argued since its inception, the most problematic aspect of any lever of power like Bill 59 is the fact that it will be selectively enforced. In this case it would be a safe wager that it will be enforced using the guidelines of UN Resolution 16/18 making it a criminal act to criticize Islam, but not stopping Islam from calling for the genocide of non-believers under their right to religious freedom.

Back to the Post:

Bill 59 assigns new powers to the Quebec Human Rights Commission (QHRC) to combat hate speech, as well as a variety of other provisions meant to protect against extremism, by censoring speech that promotes “fear of the other.” Ominously, the bill would allow the QHRC to pursue websites that in its estimation describe and denounce Islamism.

The bill takes its inspiration from recommendations made public by the QHRC in November 2014. Jacques Frémont, the commission’s president, explained that he planned to use the requested powers to sue those critical of certain ideas, “people who would write against … the Islamic religion … on a website or on a Facebook page.”

Let’s let that sink in for a moment before we move forward.

The Quebec Government is contemplating a bill that seems, even overtly, to criminalize and punish anyone who criticizes a political/religious ideology. Even if islam was not a threat doctrine this bill is an outrageous affront to the most core principles of democracy. One cannot make an informed choice without information.

So who is this Jacques Frémont?

Below is a short video with a couple of tiny excerpts from an hour long speech in French where he seems to tip his hand a little bit. In all fairness, I do not speak French, so I cannot be certain that these short excerpts which were sent to us properly represent his point of view. So here is a link to the entire video. Anyone wishing to and who can speak French may want to check it out and make sure these quotes are fairly taken. They are at:

12:11  16:39  and the first cut is within the first 3 minutes. Its only one line.

The Montreal Gazette covered yesterday’s hearings on Bill 59

Quebec hate-speech bill prompts strong opinions at public hearings

But the most heated debates took place at the end of the day with the Association des musulmans et des arabes pour la laïcité au Québec (the Association of Muslims and Arabs for a secular Quebec).

Bill 59 was one of a slew of initiatives presented June 10 by the Quebec government to combat radicalization leading to violence, as it pledged to work with the city of Montreal on a deradicalization centre — their concerted response to terrorist attacks last October and the phenomenon of youths leaving Quebec to join terrorist ranks.

But it was also an answer to how to deal with the growing problem of Islamophobia, and on both counts AMAL-Québec welcomed the initiative.

“It is obvious that when the call to hate, demonize, and dehumanize certain groups becomes commonplace, it has the effect of accentuating attitudes filled with prejudice and stereotypes,” said AMAL president Haroun Bouazzi, before the Commission des institutions at the National Assembly in Quebec City.

For anyone uncertain about what “the call to hate, demonize, and dehumanize certain groups” means, just read a koran, the hadiths and the Sunna, or book of the life of Islam’s founder, Mohamed. Alternativly, sit in for a week or so at any mosque and listen to the sermons. Maybe bring a tape recorder so you can have the Arabic bits translated later.

One might wonder if this particular pernicious individual is so dangerous to real liberty and the Enlightenment if he had caught the notice of any of the Counter-Jihadists before?

Check out this post and video from Dec. 2014:

“I’m sorry. The debate is over. Islam is the religion of Peace!”

This is an interview with the President of the Quebec Human Rights Commission. In it, he appears to be saying that Quebec, or Canada, is going to be implementing something which looks a whole lot like the criminalization of criticism of Islam.

I would like to remind every man, woman, child and bureaucrat that freedom of speech was implemented for one thing in the West. To criticize religious and political authority. That once you limit that freedom even one little bit, all other freedoms of speech will diminish exponentially, because all things can be seen as functions of islamic observance.

Thank you Poste De Veille for the interview video and Sassy for the Translation.

Could it be that the time to make that most ancient of decisions which almost define human history has arrived for Quebecers?

The answer to that appears imminent. The desicion?

Do we stand and fight, or do we move to somewhere not as far along the downward spiral of despotism.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog

The Shocking Testimony of a Calais Resident Surrounded by 3,000 Illegal Immigrants

August 15, 2015 – Written by Caroline Alamachère and translated for VladTepesBlog by CB Sashenka with much thanks!

From the excellent website from France,

Riposte Laique

This government is the dregs of our country, the shame of our nation!

Hollande (President of France), Valls (French Prime Minister), Cazeneuve (Minister of Interior), Taubira (Justice Minister), and their associates, and all the others who allow the French to live in fear because of your thoughtlessness and your submission to superior diktats from foreign countries not worth mentioning, you submit the people to hordes of barbarians that come from who knows where, individuals whom the media portray as unfortunate victims of war so that they can be fed on the money of those whom they terrorize

The testimony of two Calais residents, a mother and daughter, frightening in its harshness, in its horror, heart-rending in its sincerity, in the traumatic silence of an unfortunate Calais resident found one day holed up in her basement, terrorized by rioting illegals whom even the police are afraid to approach.

Her daughter tells all, bluntly, frantically, in a hurry, in anguish. And she accuses. She accuses these good-for-nothings, these jackasses, these government pieces of garbage for allowing this evil in, destroying everything in its path.

Bastards that you are, bad guys, despicable turds!

This woman courageously tells, in a few minutes, the inconceivable, the extreme poverty of her mother, the security she had to enforce around her house that’s only missing a watchtower, the games of the illegal immigrants who are having a good time forgetting that they were asked to look sad and haggard, the inaction of police officers and their council to do their job for them with the added lawsuit risk on top of everything. Thank you Taubira! (French Justice Minister)

And those French who suffer the reprisal, the aggression, and who are asked to pay, to pay and pay, over and over again, until they bleed, until there is no longer enough to eat, so that others may live high off the fat of the land at our expense and afford the latest smart-phones, so that they can enjoy the space just around the corner from you to play soccer while you’re closing the fourth lock on your armoured door, and firefighters wait for a moment of calm before entering the forbidden city so they don’t risk their lives, with the help of police officers, the same ones who never come when they are called, when an old lady silenced by fear is in danger to the point of having to run to her cellar like a rat, when it’s her daughter who comes at 3:00 am, alone, to help her.

Hollande, Valls, Cazeneuve, Taubira, you’re monsters, hydras. You are not legitimate to govern my country, you are guilty of the daily deaths due to your complacency, your treachery.

And you, the French people, where are you?! Will you finally wake up from your apathy, yes or no? What are you waiting for, for your kid to be killed? How many attacks will it take for you to do something!

Article translation and tip by CB Sashenka, video translation: Oz-Rita with much thanks to both of you for such great work in such a short time.

Obama’s Betrayals: Willfully Supporting Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood

Front Page Magazine

Editor’s note: The following is the first article in the FrontPage series “Obama’s Betrayals,” which will explore the president’s record of perfidy, malfeasance and crimes against the American people. As the Obama presidency enters its final stages, examples of this treachery are only becoming more numerous and brazen. “Obama’s Betrayals” will shine the spotlight on these attacks on the American polity, the incredible damage they are inflicting on the nation, and the dangerous agenda the president intends to complete before leaving office.

It doesn’t get any more explosive than this: a high-ranking former Obama administration official charging that the administration made a conscious decision to support al-Qaeda – so where is the mainstream media?

Brad Hoff reported in Foreign Policy Journal last Friday that “in Al Jazeera’s latest Head to Head episode, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Michael Flynn confirms to Mehdi Hasan that not only had he studied the DIA memo predicting the West’s backing of an Islamic State in Syria when it came across his desk in 2012, but even asserts that the White House’s sponsoring of radical jihadists (that would emerge as ISIL and Nusra) against the Syrian regime was ‘a willful decision.’”

Click to continue:

H/T Blazing Cat Fur

Amazing self blinkering by French pro illegal activist

You can make this one a game. Look for the various flaws in the logic of this women who clearly works very hard at her own expense to feed people who hate her. She makes up excuses like a battered wife.

My personal favorite is when she claims the did what they did to her food because of a consumer culture. But they don’t come from one, she does. Yet she is the charitable one. Stunning self blinding.

Thank you Sassy for the rapid translation.

The Changing Rules of Politically Correct Poker

Not so much that the rules change perhaps, as what constitutes a winning hand. Basically the strong call the wild cards.

First, the video:

Now this article from Nicolai Sennels:

And then this article from Blazing Cat Fur. Don’t skip the comments.

The full video is here.

Thank you Nicolai and Liberty Dk.



Saudi royals ‘bar’ French policewomen from beach

Sharia can spread by a few means, not the least of which is money. We are more used to seeing thugs creating ‘volunteer’ sharia patrols in European and other countries to force sharia on the locals in increments. But the Saudis do it with the kind of influence petro-dollars can force. 

Article here at the Local 

The article details the recent history of this beach and how the Saudis have taken full control with the consent and cooperation of the far left islamic sympathetic French government.


Austria launches criminal investigation against Geert Wilders

(This from the land that gave us the little corporal who did more damage to Europe and Western civilization than Caligula, dares to try to absolve itself by taking down the man who could be the next Churchill)

From the PVV:

Exactly on the day that a poll by Dutch national public TV revealed that the Party for Freedom (PVV) has become the biggest party in Netherlands, the country’s major newspaper De Telegraaf announced that Austria is launching a criminal investigation against PVV leader Geert Wilders.


Here is the translation of the article in De Telegraaf

Austria preys on Geert Wilders

Geert Wilders is facing prosecution in Austria. The Public Prosecutor in Vienna is investigating whether the PVV leader is guilty of incitement during a speech last March.
In the Alpine state, there is a maximum sentence of two years for this offence.

Press Officer Nina Bussek of the Vienna prosecutor’s office cannot say how long the investigation will take, and whether Wilders will also be questioned by a prosecutor. “I can confirm that we are investigating following complaints against declarations he made during the event.” The [Austrian] law prohibits hurting religious feelings or inciting to violence against a religion.
On 27 March, Wilders held a long speech in the Hofburg in Vienna at the invitation of the rightwing nationalist party FPÖ. He spoke strong language about the necessity to reduce Islam.
Wilders visit was special, because Vienna is the city where, in 1683, the rise of the Ottoman Empire was halted. “Also today, we have a clear message for Islam: you will not conquer Vienna,” Wilders said.
In his speech, Wilders said that Austria had to change the present reality, “that Islamic brutality has gained a foothold in our countries. We are confronted with halal meals, with headscarves, burqas, honor killings, female genital mutilation, polygamy, mega mosques.”

“Since the darkest days of paganism many centuries ago, we have not experienced these atrocities anymore. Now they are back. Islam has brought them back,” Wilders continued. “I say: let us regain our freedoms.”
To this end, the PVV leader called for a ban on the Koran. He also said “No more mosques. Close all Islamic schools. Today! No to mullahs and imams.”
In a reaction, Wilders expressed his disappointment in Austria. “It is particularly ironic that the authorities capitulate there where a few centuries ago the West was protected against Islam. But I will continue to honor the gates of Vienna and stand upright. Speaking the truth about Islam and immigration are thus rewarded with a place on death lists and prosecution or investigation for prosecution by the Public Prosecutor in several countries. Earlier in the Netherlands and Jordan, now in the Netherlands again and in Austria. This is a major attack on freedom of speech, but no one will be able to silence me.”

Geert Wilders’ speech in Vienna on March 27, 2015

Click here to read the article (in English) in the NL Times

Click here to read the article (in German) in the Austrian newspaper Kurier

Click here to see the results of the latest poll:

Reinventing the Tennessee Jihadist 

(This is a slightly different version of Sonia’s article published a few hours earlier at American Thinker)

Sonia Bailley

July 21, 2015

(Summary: The deceptive use of Western terminology by Muslim organizations, as well as the outlawing of truth about Islam and jihad by the Obama administration, is misleading American citizens and rendering them incapable of identifying the jihadist enemy. When an enemy cannot be identified, he cannot be defeated.)

“He died doing what he loved”.  No, I am not referring to any one of the five slain unarmed U.S. servicemen at the navy reserve center in Chattanooga, Tennessee.  I am referring to their killer, Islamic terrorist Mohammed Yusef Abdulaziz.  This young jihadist chose the path of conduct declared by Allah in the Koran to be the right one.  This righteous path requires the removal of nonbelievers who hinder the advancement of Islam and the establishment of the supremacy of Allah.  However, the Obama administration, the FBI, the mainstream media, and all other apologists for Islam, refuse to call this attack Islamic terrorism.

Abdulaziz fulfilled Islamic law by killing those guilty of the highest crime in Islam, the crime of rejecting Allah and Mohammed.  Punishing this treasonous crime is mandated in the Koran, Hadiths (26), and other Islamic-based doctrines such as the Reliance of the Traveller (f1.3), Islam’s most authoritative book on Islamic law and conduct.  In Islam, nonbelievers, including the slain U.S. servicemen, are viewed as obstacles in the path of Allah.  They are not considered innocent, and therefore require removal.  Killing them, or waging jihad, is therefore justified as an act of defense against those who are hindering the rule of Allah.

Abdulaziz knew he would be guaranteed a high place (4645) in Paradise for waging jihad and defending Islam, and a higher place if he were to die while fighting.  However, waging jihad goes well beyond mere justification.  Waging jihad is a deeply-entrenched duty and commandment from Allah to subjugate non-Muslims worldwide to Islamic rule so that only the rule of Allah prevails.  This is what lies at the heart of not radical Islam, but Islam itself.  Scholars of Islamic law would agree with this.

The attacks at the U.S. military facilities on the last day of Ramadan, the Islamic month rife with jihad right from Islam’s inception, were clearly inspired by the same jihad ideology of the Koran.  Hatred and hostility for non-Muslims fill the pages of the Koran.  In fact, over 60% of the Koran is about non-Muslims who are dehumanized and cursed by Allah, and considered the worst of creatures with diseased hearts.  Nonbelievers are not to be taken as friends.  It is no wonder that many Muslims harbour such deep hatred towards nonbelievers and commit jihad the world over — which would explain why 80% of foreign terrorist groups listed on the U.S. Department of State website are Islamic. Continue Reading →

Ted Cruz handles one of the oldest rhetorical tricks beautifully.

I wasn’t going to post anything else tonight but this was just too good. Ted Cruz, Republican presidential hopeful, was asked the Marxist version of one of the oldest rhetorical tricks in the book. The classic example of this is, ‘”How often do you beat your wife?” but its been updated to, “Do you have a personal animosity against gay Americans?”.

Mr. Cruz dealt with it precisely as he should have. If people do not like it, its a failure of the public and not of his character or thought process.