Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the new dark ages.

From The Daily Caller

School District Outlaws Depiction Of ‘ANY RELIGIOUS LEADER’ After Mom Protests Muhammad Drawing
A school district superintendent in semi-rural Southern California has completely outlawed all drawings of all religious leaders on campus because a history teacher assigned a vocabulary worksheet that asked students to draw images of Muhammad.

Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District superintendent Brent Woodard implemented the far-reaching ban after a single parent complained, reports the Los Angeles Daily News.

The seventh-grade history assignment at High Desert School in Acton, Calif. was a worksheet called “Vocabulary Pictures: The Rise of Islam.” It featured several words including Quran, Mecca, Bedouins and Muhammad. There was space for students to sketch their own images representing the various words.

The parent who found the assignment offensive is Melinda Van Stone, a chiropractor in nearby Palmdale.

Click to continue (to the end of the Enlightenment)

Toronto man wearing “Infidel” patch stabbed for allegedly offending Muslims

(The only question is, how much time will the guy get in jail for wearing an infidel patch?)

From CIJ News:

On Sunday, September 20, 2015 at 11:18pm, CP24 dryly reported that “a man in his 50\s is in serious condition in a hospital after he was stabbed multiple times in Scarborough on Sunday night.”

According to the Police, “the man was stabbed in the area of Danforth Road and St. Clair Avenue East, just after 10 p.m. Sunday” and “several suspects were seen fleeing the area on foot.”

CP24 also quoted the Paramedics who said that “the man was rushed to the hospital trauma centre for treatment. He suffered multiple stab wounds.”

Since then the Police has not provided any further details about the motive of the stabbing attack or the identity of the perpetrators.

On October 29, CIJnews sent a query to the Police containing a link to the CP24 news report accompanied with the following questions:

Did the Police arrest any suspects?
What was the motive of the stabbing attack?
Does the Toronto Police regard this stabbing attack a hate crime/ terrorist attack/ criminal attack?

In response to the query, the Police Media Relations Officer wrote in an email sent to CIJnews that she “was unable to locate an incident with the location you have provided” and asked for “more information to follow up.”

Please click over to CIJ news for the rest of this article.

(The site, CIJ News, is run by ex-Israeli intel operative, Jonathan Halavi who used to do the intelligence file on Ezra Levant’s SUN TV show, the Source. A follow up story is this one on how Canadian Middle East policy will be changing)

H/T dagawker

Crippled Toronto man denied subsidized housing because he is not muslim

I would welcome any links on the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam in the comments. Much has appeared at this site over the years about them. Today there was a swearing in ceremony for 33,000 of them as they swore fealty to the Caliph and Caliphate as they envision it.

Below are materials which discuss the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam.

Beware the skunk with the potpourri.

Denmark: “moderate” Ahmadiyya Muslims behind new political party refused to answer simple questions


The Caliphate Plan


Saudi royals ‘bar’ French policewomen from beach

Sharia can spread by a few means, not the least of which is money. We are more used to seeing thugs creating ‘volunteer’ sharia patrols in European and other countries to force sharia on the locals in increments. But the Saudis do it with the kind of influence petro-dollars can force. 

Article here at the Local 

The article details the recent history of this beach and how the Saudis have taken full control with the consent and cooperation of the far left islamic sympathetic French government.


Dutch Government/TV station sabotage Geert Wilders’ planned broadcast

Showing that the Netherlands, like most of Europe and Canada, are at least partly under the sharia and moving more that direction and away from our own cultural and constitutionally mandated laws where they conflict with islamic values.


Wilders blames sabotage for failure to broadcast Mohammed cartoons

The national public broadcasting company NPO is investigating why a party political broadcast by the PVV showing anti-Mohammed drawings was not transmitted as planned. PVV leader Geert Wilders pledged to show the drawings during the broadcast but instead an old item was aired instead. Wilders has accused the public broadcaster of sabotage and has now placed the item featuring the cartoons, which is 2.45 minutes long, on YouTube. The video is due to be broadcast twice more later this month

Below, is the official PVV press release on this issue


Dutch public televison sabotaged broadcast Muhammad cartoons


Today, it looks like the Dutch public television sabotaged the political broadcast by the Party for Freedom.

In this broadcast, PVV leader Geert Wilders wanted to show a selection of Mouhammad cartoons from the Garland exhibition, which was attacked by terrorists last month.


Geert Wilders: “It is an absolute disgrace, if the public television censored a broadcast by a political party. Freedom of speech has been violated. This is scandalous in a democratic country!”


Now, we will show the cartoons on June, 24 at 17.55 pm on NPO1


AM radio call from the organizer of the freedom of speech event at Parliament Hill scheduled for May 20, subsequently cancelled, along with limits to Danish event

Here are segments of tonight’s Late Night Counsell from AM radio CFRA after the show host was made aware of the Free Speech event planned for Parliament hill tonight. Emails and callers including the woman, Alexandra, who organized the event called in to discuss it. Show host John Counsell was very good on the issue.


Earlier today, Vlad Tepes posted an article about a gathering for irreverent religious drawings to take place in Bornholm Denmark. The mayor of that town has now said that no drawings of mohamed should be shown at this meeting as of 1:30 AM ET. So early morning in Denmark.

Liberty Dk translated this article from the Danish press for us:

The peoples meeting must be held with words and arguments, not with deeply provocative drawings.

So says Mayor of Bornholm Regional Municipality, Winni Grosbøll (S), who flatly refuses to let the works from the recent “Draw the Prophet Mohammed” competition by American Islam critic Pamela Geller be exhibited at the political festival.

“The people’s meeting is about words and arguments. The drawings would completely short-circuit the debate. There is no reason to do that, and you can easily have discussions without doing it with pictures and drawings” she says, calling it an unnecessary provocation:

“They do not belong here. They will have to find a gallery or an art exhibition that will show that sort of stuff” she says.
It is the organizations “Stop the Islamisation of Denmark” (SIAD) and “Free Denmark”, who are organizing the political “Progress Party” tent at the public meeting who wanted to include the drawings. Anders Gravers Pedersen, the head of SIAD, explains that they had intended to exhibit the drawings from Islam critic Pamela Geller’s competition. The competition was the victim of an attack in early May.

Two armed assassins who were self-proclaimed Islamists, allegedly linked to the Islamic State, were shot and killed as they tried to penetrate the arrangement in Garland, Texas.
Pamela Geller is known as a very vocal critic of Islam. She has, amongst other things, fought against the building of an Islamic cultural center near Ground Zero in New York. She has also accused President Barack Obama of being a secret Muslim who wants to destroy the United States.

Quebec school uses sharia standards to threaten a man to remove Facebook opinion about islam

This is a very important story and has a rather interesting peripheral message as well.

A Quebec father is rightfully furious that his child’s elementary school forced him to take down his opinion of islam from his own Facebook page under threat of being charged with a “hate crime”.

His opinion of Islam was that it was a “shitty religion” (which I feel is a gross understatement) because the school was teaching his own young child about islam which the father found objectionable as they already have a family religion.

The surprise element here is that the teacher was making the kids draw mohamed and somehow this is suddenly OK.

This is rather excellent proof of what I consider the unspoken axiom of sharia law.

Essentially that goes, ‘anything is OK if it is for the advancement of Islam, including drinking at a strip joint so long as the next night you are flying kufr aircraft into buildings, and drawing mohamed is also OK so long as its for indoctrinating kids to feel favorable towards islam. Otherwise, these are death-penatly offenses.

More proof that islam is less a religion than it is a system for manifest destiny.

This would be one of those news items where it would be good, if you are anywhere in Canada, to write the media, your local MP, any constitutional lawyers you might know and start a push back to make sure that no school or other institution ever tries a stunt like this again to any Canadian ever.

Thank you Blazing Cat Fur, PDB., Sassy for the translation and Gates of Vienna for the chat on this and the tech work and CB Sashenka for the editing.

Muslims celebrate the killer in Copenhagen as a great man with a heart of gold

If there was ever a video that needs to be sent to every media person, every relative, everyone in denial, and every politician in the damn free world, this may well be it.

(This is now going to be the top post for some hours. For newer posts, please scroll down. Some augmenting material will be added here in this post as well.)

Are the police at war on terror or with free speech? National anti-terror unit handed list of Charlie Hebdo stockists to local forces who then went round demanding to know who bought copies

Daily Mail:


  • Distributor John Menzies passed details of magazine stockists to police 
  • Police chiefs then told specific forces where magazine was being sold 
  • Details were intended to ‘provide community reassurance’  
  • But local officers went to shops and demanded details about customers 
  • Britain’s anti-terror police chief said it was ‘overzealous and unnecessary’
  • Controversial issue featured cartoon of Prophet Mohammed on front cover 


Anti-terror units handed local police officers the names of British newsagents who stocked the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in the wake of the Paris attacks.

But the decision by some forces to then visit the outlets and quiz shopkeepers about who bought the publication was ‘overzealous and unnecessary’, Britain’s anti-terror police chief has said.

Sir Peter Fahy, chief constable of Greater Manchester Police (GMP) and national police lead for preventing extremism, said he was now urgently clarifying guidance to all UK forces.

It comes after police were caught asking British newsagents which sold copies of the satirical magazine for details of the customers who bought it.

Click to continue:

The Hypocrite from Paris

By Carpe Diem


Terror supporter Mahmoud Abbas at the Paris solidarity march


Reuters reports1 that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has ordered an investigation into a cartoon apparently depicting the Prophet Mohammad in an official Palestinian newspaper.

The move came less than a month after Abbas joined world leaders in a march for free speech in Paris following a deadly attack by Islamist gunmen on the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, which had caricatured Mohammad.

A drawing in the West Bank-based newspaper al-Hayat al-Jadidah on Sunday showed a robed man standing astride Earth and reaching into a heart-shaped pouch to sow seeds of love around the world. The caption reads: “Our Prophet Mohammad”.


The caricature published in Palestinian daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah

Artist Mohammed Sabanneh, a Muslim, said he meant no harm. The figure was not Mohammad but “a symbol of humanity enlightened by what the Prophet Muhammad brought,” he wrote on Facebook.
Islam frowns on any depictions of its most revered prophet. Strict interpretations of Islamic scripture ban drawing any sentient beings, although court artists in past centuries drew Mohammad in illuminated manuscripts.
In a report late on Monday, the official Palestinian news agency WAFA said Abbas had ordered “an immediate investigation.”

Abbas in France oddly happy

The new Charlie Hebdo cover.

1. Charlie Hebdo’s new caricature ‘unjustifiably provocative’: Egypt’s Dar Al-Ifta

(it is stupefying to try and grasp that muslims believe that any drawing is a greater offense than the murder of some 16 people over them. But that is Islam in a nutshell. Where it belongs.   *~@:^{)>   <—– An atypical moment of a happy mohamed in ASCI art)

Charlie Hebdo’s decision to renew the publication of caricatures of Prophet Mohamed is “an act unjustifiably provocative to the feelings of a billion and a half Muslims worldwide who love and respect the Prophet,” Egypt’s Dar Al-Ifta warned in a statement on Tuesday.

The new issue of Charlie Hebdo will cause a “new wave of anger” in France and the West in general, the statement said, adding that it “will not serve the dialogue between civilisations which Muslims seek.”

The cover of the first edition of the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo since 12 of its staff members were killed by Islamist gunmen last week showed a cartoon of the Prophet Mohamed crying and holding up a “Je suis Charlie” sign under the words “All is forgiven.”

Note from Eeyore:

The thing about this graphic I like, is it is even funnier upside down:

Post killing Charlie hebdo Cover 180 degrees.1

H/T Grace

BBC Asia interviews a Hamas leader on their ties with Iran and ambitions.

This is a significant interview and while it was supposed to be available in English by request, no request was answered by those who asked. Please download and spread this video by any and all means in case it is removed. It must be seen and understood. While it isn’t a ‘sexy’ video of psychos screaming, it is an extremely powerful person calmly discussing geopolitically significant matters such as nuclear weapons, genocide, strategic alliances and enmity as well as ambitions as well as the implementation of sharia in Gaza. Add to this recent demonstrations of Hamas’ alliance with Turkey and we see what could be a game changer in the region.

A brief look at what sharia law looks like in the UK

Most people are appalled by sharia because of its draconian punishments. Personally I find that absolutely the least problematic aspect of it.

Earlier today I happened to have the chance to chat with a friend about the nature of sharia and I asked him honestly, “what is wrong with beheading and cutting off the hands of thieves?”

He was flabbergasted that I would even ask that and was stuck for an answer. I pointed out that in fact we incarcerate thieves and in the US we execute some people. While I do agree that amputations etc. are not an acceptable form of punishment thats actually a rather academic problem in terms of the sharia.

The real problems are:

The nature of the charges

The process used to determine guilt or innocence

The systems used for the implementation of force in the event of a guilty verdict.

In the sharia, anyone can make an accusation, especially against an unbeliever. Not only can they be accuser, but they can also be the police, the judge, the jury and the executioner. The process for evidence is hearsay and the punishment is often death at the hands of the accuser on the spot.

Religious muslims see absolutely nothing wrong with that. For example, in the ultimate victimless crime of blasphemy, a person can be killed on the spot and the killer will be celebrated by the community. Even if there are no witnesses. Even if in reality, a muslim man borrowed a lawn mower from a Christian who wanted it back and so the accusation of blasphemy was leveled. No one will ask questions. And no one will check his garage.

So how would that look in its initial stages in England? Would people use force against someone who blasphemed? Which way would a Muslim expect the police to act? To side with the person who used grotesque force against a blasphemer or to side with the person who was attacked?

Video from CLASH DAILY