Just look for videos of traffic in Cairo, Baghdad, Istanbul, Jeddah, Dhaka, Teheran… There’s got to be a fatwa somewhere, stating that if one displays the driving skills required from those who pass, say, tough American or Swiss driving tests, they’ll be sentenced to that imaginary mahoundian hell fire. And mahound-worshipers sure follow its guidelines when they’re allowed to get their dirty hoofs on Western soil, like this Saudi “diplomat.”

But the worst part is to see our sackless authorities and politicians let them get away with their “halal driving” without little or no risk of having to face the consequences when they cause accidents. LARD Nazir Ahmed, that Porkistani UK “lord” given his job by Dhimmi Tony Blair, killed a man not too long ago by text-messaging while driving way above the speed limit (as most people do in his native Porkistan), and got off the hook practically scot free.

While diplomatic immunity might be claimed as a reason not to have that Saudi dirtbag be held accountable for his reckless driving, we’ve seen way too many examples of how, in other situations, laws are bent or not enforced at all in order to appease or avoid offending mahoundians. A couple of weeks ago I even read that laws against domestic violence are NO LONGER strictly enforced in Manchester, UK, due to political correctness.

Politicians who are not committed to putting an end to such outrages, committed in the name of making mahoundians’ lives as good as possible in the civilized world of Dar al-Harb, should never be elected or reelected for any political office. If the consequences of not enforcing laws per se weren’t already bad enough for the job of keeping the order in any civilized society, not enforcing them for the sake of appeasing 7th-Century mahoundian scumbags just adds insult to injury.

I think your Mo, Larry and Curly logo is great !

If a Canadian or US citizen with “diplomatic immunity” were to have done the same crime in Saudi Arabia, do you think they would have been treated this way?