Charles Krauthammer adds value to the question, ‘What side is Obama fighting for?’ whether he intends to or no.

Comparing the US led effort to look like it is fighting the Islamic State to when president Clinton attacked our long term allies in Serbia is an interesting exercise. For one thing, they seemed to know where every strategic target in Belgrade was, as well as every precious artifact that should be spared for posterity. Clearly under Clinton the US military had some amazing intel and technology. Then you have today, where the US is incapable, by its own admission, of seeing a Toyota Land Cruiser full of jihadis in the desert at night because its lights are out on its way to destroy an entire city of priceless historical artifacts.

Here Charles Krauthammer makes some further statistical comparisons that ought give one pause.

H.T M

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

2 Replies to “Charles Krauthammer adds value to the question, ‘What side is Obama fighting for?’ whether he intends to or no.”

  1. This woman (Kelly?) seems to have it all: stunning Beauty, a sharp mind, courage and a good interviewing style. I can only retire into the “green-eyed-monster-corner” and pout: why didn’t I turn out like this.

    More seriously though: why are there no more like her (physical beauty not neccessary) in the media who seems to have turned from 4th Estate to 5th Column of the West.

  2. PS:

    Eeyore! I just LORVE your editorials. I know time is in greater short supply than than good will in the media today, but if you can: More Please 🙂