There is one small point where I disagree with Mr. Wilders, or perhaps its that Geert just was distracted and gave a sub-optimal answer in this interview.
And it was on the point of deporting non-Muslim criminals from The Netherlands. While on the surface it was a reasonable answer Geert gave, the central point in my opinion is that there is a fundamental difference between a crime and an act of political sabotage, jihad, war, etc. Muslims are instructed to do certain crimes and maintain certain attitudes from the mosques and Islamic authorities and organizations all over the world were Muslim communities exist. To equate this with crime is a guaranteed loss for the West. Throughout history a society has treated crimes committed by its own citizens in a fundamentally different way than acts of aggression by outsiders for the purpose of conquest and in this case, manifest destiny.
I think Geert could have made that distinction as well. Yes, strip citizenship from Muslim agitators and no, various other people who commit crime for crime’s sake may not need the same treatment even if the global solution is not so objectionable at the end of the day.