Obama’s New CIA Director: “Jihad is Holy Struggle, a Legitimate Tenet of Islam”

Front Page

Sometimes I wonder, can’t we just cut out the middle man and appoint terrorists to all the top national security positions? At least that way we would know exactly where we stand.

Instead Obama plans to nominate John Brennan, also known as every movie villain ever, to be the CIA Director. It seems like it would be simpler to just pick the first guy out of Gitmo and give it to him, but Brennan has more tenure than they do.

So instead we’re about to get a CIA Director who thinks like this

The President’s strategy is absolutely clear about the threat we face. Our enemy is not “terrorism” because terrorism is but a tactic. Our enemy is not “terror” because terror is a state of mind, and as Americans we refuse to live in fear. Nor do we describe our enemy as “jihadists” or “Islamists” because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam

Never mind what they call themselves, we’re going to pretend that they’re not Jihadists because we’ll beat them with the mighty power of denial.

Click to continue:

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

10 thoughts on “Obama’s New CIA Director: “Jihad is Holy Struggle, a Legitimate Tenet of Islam”

  1. Obama was raised by Moslems and communists to hate the US and Western Civilization, of course he is going to appoint people who think like him.

  2. I remember when Obama tried to appoint Chas Freemen to head the National Intelligence Council, I looked Mr. Freeman up and read one of his articles. He took the Arab position, 100%. Chas went on to explain that peace would break out in Palestine when the Israelis decided to come to the table and talk “peace”. As far as Chas was concerned, the problem was 100% the fault of Israel. And this was the guy Obama wanted to use. Barrack is a Saudi mole or, more likely, a KGB agent, like Ho Chi Min or Yasser Arrafat. Hell! The European Union isn’t exactly in love with the United States either, maybe they created him. So many enemies – so many clever intelligence bureaus…

  3. I am sorry but this is exactly correct in my opinion.

    It was Bush that was trying to change a term of fear and tactics in to a war. It was never a logical means to deal with an enemy. A war on an fear or tactics is a never ending war. At least this guy gives real targets. “We will deny al-Qaeda and its affiliates safe haven.”

    Our countries are not ready to commit to war with Islam and until we are this is a step in the right direction in my opinion. At least the wording why they are giving Al-Qaeda arms and supplies is a different matter.

  4. I does not matter what a CIA Director think,mean or say about islam.

    islam will, without any doubt, show it self for what it is. islam is the best way to recruit anti-islamists 🙂

  5. So…. the Yanks are not to call Jihadists Jihadists because the Jihadists themselves call themselves Jihadists?

    Have I got that right? I think I need to go and lie down in a darkened room for a while. What a total fuckwit.

  6. Correct. “Jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam.”
    It is indeed. This man is speaking the truth here.

    Jihad is vital to the Muslim faith. Muslims have no excuse not to partake in it.
    The only detail missing is what the definition of jihad really is. Jihad is murder and conquest! It is a holy struggle to defend and spread the Muslim faith by whatever means possible including war, violence, subterfuge and deceit. Jihad is what makes Islam so incredibly dangerous and so incredibly evil, yet without jihad, Islam is incomplete.

  7. President Bush was trying to fight a war against militant Islam without being politically incorrect, he was right this is a war not a crime problem.

  8. From ‘Dictionary on Islam’ published 1895 via Kitman TV:

    “JIHAD (oV^). Lit. “An effort,
    or a striving.” A religious war with those
    who are unbelievers in the mission of Muhammad,
    it is an incumbent religious duty,
    established in the Quran and in the Traditions
    as a divine institution, and enjoined
    specially for the purpose of advancing Islam
    and of repelling evil from Muslims.
    When an infidel’s country is conquered by
    a Muslim ruler, its inhabitants are olTored
    three altorn:itives :

    (1) The. reception of Islam, in -which case tho
    conquered become enfranchised citizens of the
    Muslim state.
    (2) Their payment of the poll tax {Jizyih). by
    which unbelievers in Islam obtain protection,
    and become Zimmis, provided they are not
    the idolaters of Arabia.
    (3) Death by the sword, to those who will
    not pay the poll tax.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *